<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A caution on using Dimensional DSVs in Data Mining</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bimonkey.com/2009/06/a-caution-on-using-dimensional-dsvs-in-data-mining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bimonkey.com/2009/06/a-caution-on-using-dimensional-dsvs-in-data-mining/</link>
	<description>James Beresford on Microsoft BI and Consulting in Sydney, Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Server Data Mining - Cases Missing in Mining Legend &#124; BI Monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.bimonkey.com/2009/06/a-caution-on-using-dimensional-dsvs-in-data-mining/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server Data Mining - Cases Missing in Mining Legend &#124; BI Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bimonkey.com/?p=338#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] a followup to this post I have found that not only does using a table external to the one being mined to provide a grouping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a followup to this post I have found that not only does using a table external to the one being mined to provide a grouping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

